The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise.

Affected by the epidemic, more and more countries have been "closed" for the second time, and the ports of many countries have become full of containers. Lack of containers, exploded cabins, dumped containers, jumping into ports, and frantically rising freight rates, foreign traders are under unprecedented pressure.

The latest data shows that European freight rates have increased by 170% year-on-year, and Mediterranean freight rates have increased by 203% year-on-year. In addition, as the U.S. epidemic becomes more severe and air transportation routes are blocked, shipping prices will continue to rise.

With strong shipping demand and a large shortage of containers, shippers are facing soaring container freight and surcharges, but this is just the beginning. The market may become more chaotic in the next month.

Freight rates continue to soar, 170% in Europe and 203% in the Mediterranean

China's export container shipping market continues to be high. The freight rates of many ocean routes increased to varying degrees, and the composite index continued to rise.

On November 27, the Shanghai Export Container Freight Index released by the Shanghai Shipping Exchange was 2048.27 points, an increase of 5.7% over the previous period. With the increase in freight rates and surcharges, Asia-Europe shippers will face more pain.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

Last week, the spot freight rate of containers from Asia to Northern Europe rose by 27%, breaking through US$2,000/TEU. The carrier plans to further increase FAK prices in December. The Northern European part of the Shanghai Container Freight Index (SCFI) rose by US$447 to US$2091 per TEU, up 170% year-on-year.

The price of SCFI at Mediterranean ports also surged 23% to US$2,219 per TEU, a 203% increase from 12 months ago.

For shippers in Asia and Europe, this pain of high freight rates shows no sign of ending. In addition to the large surcharges and premium product fees currently charged to ensure on-board equipment and space, freight rates will be further increased next month. .

On the return route, the situation of European exporters can be said to be worse; it is reported that they cannot secure bookings to Asia at any price before January.

Continuation of the high market, the overall freight rate continues to rise

The continued shortage of containers has further exacerbated the lack of capacity in the market, and the freight rates of most routes have increased, which has pushed up the comprehensive index.

On the European route, the capacity continues to be insufficient, and most of the flight booking rates have risen again.

For North American routes, the market supply-demand relationship remained at a relatively good level, and the spot market freight rates were high and stabilized.

On the Persian Gulf, Australia and New Zealand routes, and South America routes, the demand for transportation is strong, and the market freight rates continue to rise, rising by 8.4%, 0.6% and 2.5% respectively in this period.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

European routes have strong transport demand. The repeated epidemics in Europe have stimulated local import demand, and the market volume has remained high. The tightness of airline capacity is still increasing, and the contradiction between supply and demand has not been alleviated. Last week, the average space utilization rate of ships in Shanghai Port basically remained at the full level. Affected by this, most airlines will raise their freight rates at the beginning of next month, and the spot market freight rates will rise sharply.

On North American routes , the new crown epidemic in the United States is still severe. The cumulative number of confirmed cases and the number of new cases in a single day are still top of the list. The severe epidemic hinders the unpacking and transshipment of materials. The market capacity is relatively stable, but the market capacity is limited by the ever-increasing shortage of containers, the upside is limited, and the supply and demand conditions remain unchanged. Last week, the average space utilization rate of ships on the US West and East US routes at Shanghai Port was still close to full capacity. The route freight rate remained stable, and the spot market booking price was basically the same as the previous period.

For the Persian Gulf route , the market performance is generally stable, demand remains stable, market capacity is controlled within a relatively reasonable range, and the relationship between supply and demand remains balanced. Last week, the utilization rate of the shipping space of Shanghai Port remained above 95%, and individual flights were fully loaded. Most commercial airlines maintained their freight rates unchanged, and a few adjusted slightly, and the spot market freight rates rose slightly.

For Australia and New Zealand routes , the destination market is in the peak transportation season, transportation demand is rising steadily, and the relationship between supply and demand remains good. Last week, the average space utilization rate of ships in Shanghai Port remained above 95%, and most flights were fully loaded. Most airlines have maintained their booking prices at the previous period, but some have slightly increased, and the spot market freight rates have increased.

For South American routes , South American countries have insufficient capacity due to the epidemic, relying on imports for a large number of materials, and transportation demand continues to run at a high level. In this period, the average space utilization rate of ships in Shanghai Port was close to the full-load level. Under these fundamentals, most airlines increased their booking prices towards the beginning of the month, and the spot market freight rates increased.

Major shipping companies will issue another notice of price increases in 2021!

▍Maersk charges a peak season surcharge from the Far East to Europe

Maersk announced that it has imposed a new peak season surcharge (PSS) in Europe and East Asia from December to next year.

Suitable for refrigerated goods from the Far East to Northern and Southern European countries. The surcharge will be $1000/20' reefer container, $1500/40' reefer container, and will take effect on December 15, Taiwan PSS will take effect on January 1, 2021.

Far East to Northern Europe

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

Far East to North and South Europe

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

The Maersk 2M Alliance partner Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) will use the following various (FAK) rates from Europe to Canada and Mexico.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

• Carrier Security Check Fee (CSF): US$11 per container

  Emergency Fuel Surcharge (EBS) (when applicable): US$500 per refrigerator, US$100/TEU per dry container

In addition, MSC has made the following rate adjustments from December 1, 2020 until further notice, but not more than December 31, 2020.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

▍ CMA CGM

CMA CGM, the world's third largest container shipping company, has started the new year and will introduce the latest FAK rates from Northern Europe to Canada, the east coast of Mexico, the east and west coasts of the United States and the Gulf of Mexico.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

  Cargo: dry containers, reefer containers, tank containers and special equipment

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

  Cargo: dry containers, reefer containers, tank containers and special equipment

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

  Cargo: all types

  USEC, US Gulf and USWC include New York, Norfolk, Savannah, Charleston, Houston, Miami, New Orleans and Oakland.

From January 1, CMA CGM will also implement the following FAK rates for dry containers, reefer containers, open containers, pallets and shipper-owned containers (SOC).

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

▍Hapao features GRI rates from East Asia to the United States and Canada

Effective date: January 1, 2021.

This increase applies to all dry containers, reefer containers, non-working reefer containers, tank containers, frame containers and open top containers.

East Asia to North America (United States and Canada):

USD 960 for all 20' container types

USD 1,200 for all 40' container types

East Asia includes countries/regions in Japan, South Korea, China/Taiwan/Hong Kong/Macau, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, Indonesia, the Philippines and Russia’s Pacific Rim provinces.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

In addition, Hapag-Lloyd also released new (GRI) rates for all dry containers, reefer containers, non-operating reefer containers, storage tanks, frame containers and open top containers from South Asia and Northeast Asia to Australia , Effective from January 1st.

Southeast Asia to Australia

  US $ 150/20'

  US $ 300/40'

Northeast Asia to Australia

  US $ 300/20'

  US $ 600/40'

Southeast Asia includes Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam, while Northeast Asia includes South Korea, China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan.

According to current market conditions, Hapag-Lloyd will increase the GRI rate for all cargo and all container types from East Asia to the East Coast of South America from December 7, 2020, to USD 550 per container.

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

Hapag-Lloyd announced the rates for all 20' and 40' (high container) goods in the westbound trade from East Asia (including Japan) to Northern Europe and the Mediterranean. The collection will start on December 15, 2020, and will be collected until further notice. Various cargoes (FAK) subject to marine fuel recovery (MFR):

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

 

 

The whole route has generally risen, and the freight rate continues to rise. The shipping company announces the price increase notice in January next year!

In addition to suspension and additional surcharges, another 5 container ships jumped to the British port

As shipping companies continue to detain containers in Nordic ports and charge exporters more than US$5,000 per container to ship a container to Asia, there is increasing pressure for regulatory intervention.

British importers are currently facing major challenges. The shipping division of the Ocean Alliance has decided to transfer the other five ships that arrived in Felixstowe in December to Zeebrugge, Belgium.

According to a consultation conducted by the shipping company to its British customers last Friday , the five ships Cosco Shipping Azalea, Ever Goods, Ever Globe, CSCL Jupiter and CSCL Uranus  will no longer call Felixstowe, and will unload the British ships at Belgian ports. Imported products.

In addition, the partners of 2M and THE Alliance are also transferring ships from the congested British port, where the former is loading and unloading British cargo in Bremerhaven.

It is understood that due to the lack of open feeder ships and terminal capacity issues, it is almost impossible for British goods to be transferred before January next year. Some shipping companies are discussing not calling Felixstowe throughout January because they worry that the port will be saturated in a few weeks after Christmas.

However, as the terminals in Antwerp and Rotterdam have also become very congested, the choice of liner companies is becoming increasingly limited. However, a source from a shipping company said: "Our first priority is to reduce imports before shipping our container equipment back to Asia."

British export orders have been suspended by a number of shipping companies, and more and more orders can only be booked at other Nordic ports paying additional fees.

MSC said on Friday that it will significantly increase the FAK fee for a 40-foot container from Antwerp to Shanghai in December by 300% to US$5,000. MSC explained that it is facing very serious operational problems that have seriously affected the reliability and regular supply of inventory.

A source at a rival shipping company said the strategy is to block bookings so that MSC can return its empty containers to Asia more quickly.

He added: "If they can indeed get some reservations at this price, it will be a win-win."

At the same time, the European Shippers Council (ESC) and the European freight forwarders association CLECAT have joined forces to lobby the European Commission to intervene in this crisis.

Denis Choumert, president of ESC, said: "Shipping companies have been taking advantage of the tight capacity to increase revenue far beyond cost, which makes customers unhappy."

"The continuous unreliability of service, coupled with the record profits of the shipping company during the crisis, clearly illustrates a severely disturbed market, and shows that the carrier has substantially increased the spot freight and levied higher than the fixed-term contract price The huge surcharge."

A joint communiqué stated that ocean shipping companies serving Europe benefited from “privileges” that were provided to them by the Union’s Prevention of Immunity Regulations (CBER), which was updated in April.

"Such privileges are now too much because they allow shipping companies to use tools to manipulate the market," adding that the European Commission has not responded to the crisis so far, which is "confusing".

After the goods arrive at the port, the customer does not pick up the goods, is returned, or auctioned. What should I do?

After the goods arrive at the port, the customer does not pick up the goods, and the shipping company requests to return the goods and let us bear all the expenses.

At the end of July 2019, two shipments were delivered to Port Klang, Malaysia. The two shipments arrived at the port in mid-August, but the customer did not pick up the goods until mid-September. Before the goods arrive at the port, we have reminded the customer that the goods are about to arrive at the port. After arriving at the port, we remind the customer to pick up the goods.

In mid-August, the freight forwarder told me that the customer still did not pick up the goods. I have been urging the customer to pick up the goods, and the customer always said that he would pick up the goods on the same day, but it was delayed until mid-September. Customers do not communicate with us because they do not pick up the goods for any reason. It will always be "I will pick up the goods today."

At that time, the LCL company was impatient, and gave us an ultimatum. Let us notify the customer one last time. If the customer does not mention it, it will be returned to us, and the demurrage fee and other expenses incurred will be paid by us.

Analysis suggestion

If the foreign customer’s company goes bankrupt or the goods are not picked up after arriving at the port, it has been more than a month since the arrival of the port and incurred a lot of costs. The customer will obviously not pick up the goods. We ask the freight forwarder to explain to the shipping company that we abandon the goods, but the forwarder says at least Only half a year can be abandoned.

So here comes the problem. The port cost in half a year is estimated to be an astronomical figure, and domestic factories will definitely not be able to afford it. The value of the goods is also very low, and the future cost will definitely be much more than the value of the auction. The specific questions are as follows:

1. Will the shipping company pursue these demurrage fees, demurrage fees, and terminal fees?

2. Is it recourse to freight forwarders or foreign customers or domestic factories?

3. If they cannot pay, will the shipping company go through legal procedures?

So, how to deal with export abandonment?

1. Take the initiative to abandon the goods.

First, ask your freight forwarder to seek help from the agent at the port of destination, first change the consignee to the designated agent, and then abandon the goods in the name of the agent. Why has to be this way? Because if the consignee is not changed, it should be difficult for the consignor to abandon the goods unilaterally. But after such a change, the agent at the port of destination will have to bear a lot of responsibilities, including the cost and responsibility of abandoning the goods. This condition must be negotiated with the freight forwarder. People are willing to help you do this. How much you need to bear.

2. Resale.

See if you can find other buyers in the destination country, change the consignee of the bill of lading and then sell them to them, of course, there will be a discount. There are also major constraints in doing so. One is whether the products are customized and difficult to resell, and the other is to find customers who are willing to take over.

3. Ignore it.

Then don't care about anything, and all the liability costs will be borne by your freight forwarder. This is the most embarrassing thing. Maybe you are all right, but the freight forwarder and the company who picked up your shipment are in bad luck. The key is that this matter is not the responsibility of others. Of course, the other party may also go to court with you. According to Article 86-88 of the Maritime Law, if the consignee has a problem, the consignor must bear the cost.

4. Return shipment.

You can return to the domestic bonded area for storage. If there is a new order that is sent abroad or is undergoing inspection and maintenance, replace the package and bonded warehouse for simple processing such as packaging, relabeling, and shell replacement. Sent abroad. The bonded area is equivalent to foreign countries, and the return of goods to the bonded area for inspection and maintenance does not require import declaration, so there is no need to apply for the return of the goods to the customs, and there is no need to pay taxes or pay a deposit to the customs.

Domestic export goods, especially electronic products, small household appliances, etc., have a high repair rate. The traditional way of returning to the factory for repair requires multiple cumbersome procedures such as customs, commodity inspection, and national tax. Using the advantages of the bonded area and outside customs can quickly solve the repair problem.

The bonded area has a policy of "outside customs within the country", that is, it is within the national border but not under the jurisdiction of the domestic customs. Goods entering the bonded area from the country are equal to export, and entering the country from the bonded area is equal to import (import customs declaration). same.

Therefore, returning the goods returned from abroad to the bonded area means that the goods remain abroad and the import declaration has not been processed, so there is no need to apply for the return of the goods to the customs, and the returned goods to the bonded area are tax-free and can be re-exported.

Below we analyze the advantages of returning to bonded warehouse storage for repair:

a. Simple procedures : free deposit, tax exemption, exemption, exemption from commodity inspection, exemption from customs declaration, only need to provide us with the packaging, number of pieces, amount, net gross weight, and then the QP system can apply for entry maintenance and entry maintenance.

b. Fast timeliness : After the goods arrive at the Hong Kong/Shenzhen terminal, our company can arrange transportation and pick up the container and pull it back to the bonded warehouse for repairs. Workers can enter and leave the processing area freely without a visa for repairs. Shenzhen re-export.

c. Low cost : The cost of workers and maintenance site costs are much lower than those in Hong Kong or overseas.

 

After the goods arrive at the port, the customer does not pick up the goods, is returned, or auctioned. What should I do?

Case two

The customer is bankrupt, the creditor controls the goods, and the freight forwarder asks for storage fees

We have a batch of goods that we did CFR with our customers. The goods arrived in Hong Kong in July last year. Because the customer went bankrupt and disputes with creditors, the goods have not been able to withdraw. Our payment has been received in full. The agent requests for warehousing, detention fees and other fees, and our agent charges us these fees.

The domestic agent has our export tax rebate receipts, and the other party does not deliver the receipts accordingly, and the tax rebate will be declared immediately. This matter has not been resolved yet, which is very difficult. Now foreign agents threaten to auction the goods, do they have this right? Is this legally true?

Analysis suggestion

analysis:

First of all, make it clear that, as SHIPPER, you are indeed obligated to pay the storage fee for the batch of goods (the second responsible person, as long as CONSINEE does not pay, you have to pay);

Second, after the goods arrive at the port, the ownership of the batch of goods belongs to CONSINEE. If the goods are to be abandoned, CONSINEE should write a written statement before SHIPPER’s turn to write;

Third, there is no law that supports that freight forwarders can withhold your verification form. As long as they go to court, they will definitely lose the case;

Fourth, after a certain amount of storage fees are incurred at the terminal, the port of the other party does have the right to auction the goods, but the auction proceeds are paid to other creditors after the storage fees are paid. (Of course, if the auction proceeds are not enough to pay the storage fee, SHIPPER and CONSINEE are obliged to make up for it.)

Finally, if, as you said, the goods have been controlled by the customer's creditor, then the creditor should pay the warehouse rent as CONSINEE's principal. (Theoretically, if your client, as CONSINEE, does not receive the goods first, his creditor has no right to control the goods. If he has received the goods, then the owner of the goods is him instead of you. Of course it may be different. National laws are different, so only your customers will know how the local laws are)

Suggest:

After the goods arrive at the port, how can the customer return the goods or sell them to others without paying?

 

Most countries in the world have this regulation. When the imported goods arrive at the port, the jurisdiction of the goods will be transferred to the customs. In order to protect the interests of buyers, the customs will not allow anyone other than the consignee to move this. Batch of goods.

 

This has brought a lot of trouble to the seller. When the seller fails to collect the full payment and wants to control the rights of the goods, he finds that he may face a shortage of money and goods.

 

Because whether you want to return or resell, you must meet any of the following two conditions:

 

The original consignee gives a declaration of abandonment;

The original consignee clearly informed the seller to refuse to pay for the goods!

 

As a result, some buyers will keep dragging, and they will never say that they will not pay, so that you can't get the evidence. Don't even think about it!

 

As a result, the seller can only watch the time passing day by day until the goods are auctioned by the customs!

 

So I gave two methods:

 

1. Find a very capable freight forwarder. I mean the destination port forwarder. They can help solve some problems. I have a friend who has successfully solved the cargo problem in Turkey.

 

2. Looking for counsellors, some people have succeeded, but most of them can hardly be contacted.

 

In fact, these are dead horses as horse doctors, because there is hardly any better way.

 

However, today I want to tell you the good news that another method has proven effective in practice.

 

I suggested that a friend write this paragraph in the contract:

 

The payment method of this contract is to pay the balance upon seeing a copy of the bill of lading. If the buyer (specific name) has not paid the balance within 10 days of seeing the copy of the bill of lading, it is deemed that the buyer has voluntarily waived the right to the goods, and the buyer agrees to the shipper to dispose of the goods independently.

 

or:

 

If the buyer (specific name) fails to pay the payment within 10 days of seeing the copy of the bill of lading, the clause is automatically activated: the buyer (specific name) voluntarily waives the right to dispose of the goods on the ticket, the shipper is free to dispose of it, can be returned or Resell to any other third party!

 

Remember, you must ask the customer to sign back!

 

Many people will say, how can a customer sign it?

 

If the client is a serious businessman, he is not deliberately deceiving you, he will definitely sign it, because this is a normal contract clause and does not harm any interests of the client.

 

Therefore, when the customer has not paid for the goods, the contract will work. The friend gave the contract to the local agent, the agent showed it to the customs, and the Turkish customs released it.

 

I don't know if all customs will recognize this contract model, but since there is hope of success, it must be 100 points.

Someone may have said, why do you have to pay at the copy of the bill of lading? Wouldn't it be better to do 100% TT before? Who doesn't want to do a risk-free business? If you can do the TT before, who will do payment at the copy of the bill of lading, who will do the letter of credit, who will do the DP or even the OA?

Due to competition, helpless! It's like a big brother commenting on my face of slavery, because I said that I must express first, and then ask questions, because I said that even if the customer's information is incomplete, we must first deliver the value, and then ask about the specific configuration, if at the very least Foreign trade business can also be regarded as a minion, so are those who accept these non-former TT payment methods also a minion?

Persevere in self and only do TT; adhere to self and only do high value; adhere to self and wait for customers to take the initiative, and never take the initiative! Maybe this is the real hero, but I can't do it now. Apart from a few top players, how many people can do it?

What are the reasons for the “ship grabbing battle”?

Recently, container freight has soared! The number of empty ships in the market has drastically reduced. In order to preserve space, container shipping companies have started to "grab ships" in the leasing market.

Under such circumstances, Mediterranean Shipping MSC, the world's second-largest container shipping company, even started the direct ship purchase model and purchased two container ships again. It is worth mentioning that this is the 11th ship purchased by the company in a short period of time.

Alphaliner said that the large container ships currently available are insufficient, and most shipping companies have set new records for daily rent. It is particularly noteworthy that even the classic Panamax vessel of 4,000-5,300 TEU, which has suffered "years of suffering", has now risen to an incredible level, which was unimaginable a few months ago.

Driven by strong market demand, container shipping companies have begun to find ways to mobilize all available container ships.

Industry insiders pointed out that the global container shipping market is reappearing in the situation of "a ship is hard to find and a box is hard to find". The mainstream shipping companies have booked space until late December, and it is predicted that high freight rates will continue until around the Spring Festival. High freight rates and high volumes will drive the explosive growth of shipping companies in the fourth quarter.

 

       What are the reasons for the "ship grabbing battle"?

 

The "biggest" title changes hands?

Recently, MSC has successively sold and purchased multiple container ships. It is imaginative: Is the title of the world's largest container shipping company changing?

In addition to the two new container ships purchased by MSC as mentioned above, MSC also recently purchased another larger 5,642 TEU Panamax container ship Granville Bridge (built in 2006) from Japanese owner Doun Kisen. ), and neither party has announced the selling price.

It is worth mentioning that the sister ship of Granville Bridge, Greenville Bridge, was also sold by Doun Kisen to MSC earlier this month, with a disclosed price of US$14 million.

At the same time as Greenville Bridge, MSC also purchased another 2510TEU feeder container vessel named Bomar Hermes.

At the end of last month, MSC also spent US$158 million to purchase six large container ships of 7,500-8500TEU from the German shipowner company.

Among them, MSC paid US$114 million for 4 ships of 8,200TEU-8,500TEU. These 4 ships were 8,200TEU ER Tianping and R Tianshan and 8,500TEU ER Tokyo and ER Texas. The above 4 ships Both were built in 2006.

And the 7,849TEU ER Vancouver built in 2003 and the ER Yokohama built in 2004, packaged for $44 million.

Two days before this, MSC also purchased another Panamax container ship called Baltic East from South Korea's Changjin Merchant Marine for US$10 million.

In other words, MSC "buy" 11 ships in more than 20 days.

In addition, industry insiders said that MSC is also very likely to sign a series of large orders for 23,000 teu container ships recently.

In contrast, Maersk, the world's largest shipping company, is very calm. Recently, Maersk released its financial report for the third quarter of this year. The company’s CEO Shi Suoren added when introducing the company’s third-quarter performance report that Maersk currently has no plans to build 20,000+ TEU ships. The company only stated that some of the 10,000 TEU to 15,000 TEU ships are aging and need to be replaced, because being the original owner is more cost-effective than chartering. The company will maintain the current fleet capacity of about 4 million TEUs.

Shi Suoren said, "We are very aware of the technical risks of currently ordering ships," he added.

Analysts from Copenhagen-based sea intelligence pointed out in a report released recently that MSC may soon replace Maersk and become the world's largest shipping company.

According to the latest data from Alphaliner, the current container ship capacity of Mediterranean Shipping is 3,855,684 TEU, and the company has 5 new large ships waiting for delivery. The total capacity of these 5 new ships is 115,000 TEU. After all ships are delivered, MSC’s The total capacity will reach 3970684TEU.

Maersk’s current operating capacity is 4094302 TEU, order capacity is 46140 TEU, and the total capacity including new ship orders is 4140442 TEU.

 

      What are the reasons for the "ship grabbing battle"?

Consolidation market is hot

The price of the container shipping market has continued to run at a high level recently. On November 13, the latest Shanghai Export Containerized Freight Index (SCFI) released by the Shanghai Shipping Exchange was 1857.33 points, an increase of 11.6% over the previous period. The SCFI index has hit a new high since the 2008 financial crisis.

Zhang Yongfeng, director of the International Shipping Research Institute of Shanghai International Shipping Research Center, analyzed to a reporter from China Securities News that the recent epidemic in Europe and the United States has rebounded sharply. Import demand for daily necessities is strong, market volume is rising, container supply is tight, and the spot market freight rate The sharp increase drove the comprehensive freight index to rise.

"November is generally the traditional off-season for container shipping. This year's market conditions have far exceeded expectations. At present, the container shipping market has relatively abundant cargo and higher freight rates, continuing the pre-hot trend." Zhang Yongfeng said.

Data from the China Ports Association show that my country's foreign trade imports and exports have continued to improve recently, especially exports have further accelerated. In early November, the container throughput of the eight major hub ports increased by 13.1% year-on-year, an increase of 6 percentage points from the previous period. The foreign trade container throughput of the eight hub ports increased by 11.5% year-on-year, and the domestic trade increased by 18.3% year-on-year, both significantly faster than the previous period. In terms of subregions, the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta regions have seen strong growth in foreign trade business, with Shanghai, Ningbo, Guangzhou and Shenzhen growing at over 10%. Among them, the growth rate of Ningbo Zhoushan Port reached 33%.

With strong demand in the container shipping market, international shipping freight prices have continued to rise since June this year, and shipping prices on European routes, Persian Gulf routes, and South American routes have all increased significantly. At the same time, the domestic export container freight index is also rising sharply.

Han Jun, chief analyst of CITIC Construction Investment Transportation, believes that from the current situation, most shipping companies have already booked the space in late December. On November 22, major routes such as the European route will still see a rise in freight rates. According to information from major liner companies, freight rates will remain at a high level before the Spring Festival. During the Spring Festival next year, the shipping company will implement the suspension plan as usual. The maintenance of freight rates at a high level after March is a high probability event.

Zhang Yongfeng believes that the reason for the recent boom in the shipping market is the result of multiple factors. On the one hand, due to the impact of the global epidemic, demand was suppressed in the first half of the year, and many businesses had the need to replenish inventory; on the other hand, a large number of epidemic prevention materials were exported, and the demand for home shopping in overseas markets increased. In addition, the poor turnover of shipping containers further pushed up freight rates.

In a recent survey conducted by investors, CIMC said: “Currently, our company’s container orders have been scheduled to around the Spring Festival next year. The demand in the container market has increased significantly recently. The reasons are that first, affected by the epidemic, exported containers are scattered all over the world. The return is not smooth; second, foreign governments have introduced financial stimulus such as the epidemic relief plan, which has led to super strong performance on the demand side (such as living and office supplies) in the short term, and the housing economy is booming. It is currently judged that the “lack of boxes” situation will continue for at least some time. But the whole year of next year is not clear."

CITIC Construction Investment Research Report believes that the fundamental reason is the continuous and rapid growth of the demand side. According to data from the Container Trade Statistics Corporation (CTS), the growth rate of global container shipping trade volume remained flat in July 2020, and cargo volume accelerated in August and September. The volume of cargo in September increased by nearly 8% year-on-year. Looking at the year-on-year growth rate of the east-west trunk routes, the demand on the two major routes continued to expand, and the US route even expanded to a growth rate of more than 20%.

The research report pointed out that in the medium term, the replenishment of inventory in the US retail and wholesale industry has not yet ended, and the inventory cycle will last for at least half a year, laying the foundation for continuous improvement in demand. The achievement of RCEP can significantly reduce tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers, further strengthen the position of the manufacturing center in the Far East, and lay the foundation for the growth of regional maritime trade. In addition, from the supply side, the proportion of shipbuilding orders held is at the lowest level in history. Even considering the impact of new shipbuilding, the delivery period will be after the second half of 2023, and there is no basis for large-scale launch of capacity.

"It is still hard to say that the shipping industry has recovered in an all-round way. Overall, the global epidemic is a bad factor for the shipping industry. The epidemic has changed the cycle of cargo shipments, and traditional shipping seasonal characteristics are not so obvious." Zhang Yongfeng said.

 

       What are the reasons for the "ship grabbing battle"?

Consolidation company makes a big profit

In the third quarter just past, the container shipping market experienced a shortage of containers and skyrocketing ocean freight. At the same time, all liner companies continue to implement strict capacity management and cost control. In this context, liner companies’ performance has increased significantly.

Despite the decline in cargo volume, through combing the performance of various liner companies, in the third quarter of 2020, the revenue of 10 major liner companies in the world is still higher than the same period last year. All 10 liner companies achieved profits in the third quarter, with a total profit of 3.412 billion U.S. dollars, which was less than 800 million U.S. dollars in the same period last year, which was 4.27 times the same period last year.

Among them, Maersk has the highest profit, reaching 1.043 billion US dollars, and it is also the only liner company with a profit of 1 billion. Evergreen Shipping's profit increased the most, with a year-on-year increase of nearly 60 times.

In addition, there are three liner companies that are particularly interesting.

Among them, Star Shipping's performance in the third quarter increased by 28 times. Who would have thought that this company was once on the verge of bankruptcy. More importantly, Star Shipping has seized this opportunity in the e-commerce market and opened multiple e-commerce routes this year, driving a substantial increase in performance.

In addition, Yangming Shipping ended its long-term loss and achieved quarterly profit for the first time. But at the end of September just before the announcement of the results, Yangming Shipping announced the retirement of its former chairman Xie Zhijian. But for this achievement, old coach Xie Zhijian contributed a lot.

Finally, HMM stabilized its profitability. HMM once ended 21 consecutive quarters of losses in the second quarter of this year. At that time, the industry had different views on whether it could continue to make profits in the third quarter. The market situation has created opportunities for HMM.

On the whole, with operating income basically remaining stable, the major liner companies have achieved profits several times or even dozens of times the same period last year, which can be said to have made a lot of money.

 

       What are the reasons for the "ship grabbing battle"?

Looking ahead to next year, the analysis agency Sea-Intelligence also changed its previous forecast, predicting that the pre-interest and tax (EBIT) of the container shipping industry in 2020 will reach 14.2 billion US dollars. In April of this year, the agency predicted that the impact of the epidemic might cost the entire shipping industry US$23 billion.

Sea-Intelligence said: "There is no doubt that the performance of liner companies in 2020 will not only far exceed last year, but even better than the level of the past 8 years."

This forecast conclusion is based on the increase in freight and freight volume.

Data from Container Trades Statistics shows that in the first nine months of 2020, global container shipping volumes have fallen by 3.4%. However, the cargo volume situation has reversed sharply in recent months. In September this year, the global container shipping volume has increased by 6.9%.

Based on this, Sea-Intelligence believes: "If this growth is maintained in the fourth quarter, the global container shipping volume will only fall by 0.8% in 2020."

After the end of the third quarter, some large liner companies such as Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd also raised their full-year profit expectations. CMA CGM also stated that the market will remain strong for the rest of this year.

Although most liner companies are still more cautious about the market prospects and believe that next year's situation is unpredictable, Drewry believes that despite the second wave of the epidemic, they have optimistic expectations for liner companies' earnings in 2021.